Skip to content

CTO: Aaron Yooshin Kim (김유신)

Aaron Yooshin Kim (김유신) was the Chief Technology Officer and Co-Founder of Mound Inc. He held 20% of Krypton PTE. LTD. — the Singapore entity that controls Mound Labs. As CTO, he had direct technical responsibility for the QBridge architecture that was exploited for $80M.

On February 1, 2022 — four days after the hack — Aaron Yooshin Kim deleted his LinkedIn profile.

Aaron Yooshin Kim — LinkedIn profile screenshot


The following was captured from his LinkedIn (now deleted) and from TopioNetworks before deletion:

PeriodCompanyRole
Jun 2020 – PresentMound, Inc.CTO (Co-Founder)
Jun 2019 – PresentArtify Inc.CEO
Dec 2017 – Jul 2019ATR CompanyCTO / Developer
Feb 2016 – Dec 2017STAYGE Labs, Inc.CTO / Developer
Oct 2014 – Oct 2015Context Logic KoreaSoftware Engineer
Mar 2011 – Sep 2012MadsmartCo-founder Engineer
InstitutionCredential
Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)Bachelor of Science, Computer Science (2017)

The community noticed and documented the deletion on Reddit:

“News Alert — Aaron Yooshin Kim have deleted LinkedIn”Reddit, r/PancakeBunny

  • Deleted URL: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aaromkimys
  • Date of deletion: February 1, 2022
  • Days since hack: 4

No explanation was given. The profile had 6 connections and 9 followers at time of deletion. The LinkedIn profile showed he had been CTO since June 2020 — the same month Mound was founded.



Per Krypton PTE. LTD. corporate filings:

103-dong 1003-ho, 391, Hyoryeong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea


As CTO, Aaron Yooshin Kim was directly responsible for:

  • The architecture of QBridge and the QBridgeHandler smart contracts
  • The decision to deploy the bridge without completing its security audit
  • The resourceID parameter reassignment to the zero address — the precise change that enabled the exploit — which only the contract owner could make
  • Failure to account for the known EVM behavior (silent success on EOA calls) documented since 2019

Deleting one’s LinkedIn profile four days after losing $80M of user funds is not the behavior of someone planning to resolve the situation.